|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
OK: Churches ban firearms in wake of constitutional carry
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
It’s a bare-bones Xerox of a sign, but it’s getting the job done as churches across Green Country scramble to deal with constitutional carry.
"This law seems to change the nature of how we can keep people safe," said Rev. David Wiggs of Boston Avenue United Methodist, which will soon have dozens of "No guns" signs around the church property.
Up at First Baptist Church North Tulsa, they’ll be putting up signs, too. |
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(11/14/2019)
|
"It’s a bare-bones Xerox of a sign, but it’s getting the job done".
You're right about that.. No guns/No money..
That sign is now a beacon to tell anyone that's bent on mass murder, that no one has the capability to stop them. See'ya Sunday.. Amen brother...… |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
