|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/5/2018)
|
And his opinion matters.... why? Because he's "kind of" a celeb?
Here's a clue: Most celebs are mindless prole robots politically, who march in lockstep with the liberal bent of "the profession". The bigger the celebs, the bigger their mouths.
All saying nothing.
Point of fact: Private transfers of firearms are not commerce, hence the State has no constitutional authority to regulate them, outside penalties for selling to prohibited persons..
None. Zip. Zilch. Nada
But liberals believe that the Constitution means whatever popular opinion WANTS it to mean. The monkey wrench in their worldview is that times change but principles don't.
"It's not that our liberal friends are ignorant; it's that they know so much that isn't so." - RWR |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
