|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
DOJ Allows Federal Gun Rights Restoration for First Time Since 1992
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Key Points of the Rule Change:
--Since 1992, Congress has prohibited ATF from using funds to process gun rights restoration applications, making the statute obsolete.
--ATF will no longer handle individual firearm disability relief applications under 18 U.S.C. 925(c). DOJ will instead carry out the statute and process petitions for gun rights restoration.
--The DOJ rule goes into effect immediately upon publication and will simultaneously accept public comments on the rule before issuing a final version. |
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(3/20/2025)
|
| Feds have no authority to permanently take or "disable" ANY personal rights of ANY freed person, so the "relief" is also based on a lie. This is a good start, FINALLY though. The 2nd amendment is the most attacked, by far. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
