|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Did Ted Nugent really go too far this time?
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
... "There is no indication that Nugent, who has a reputation for blunt and colorful statements about gun rights and hunting, will back away from his remarks, nor is there any sign that the NRA is distancing itself from his comments."
"Question: Do Nugent's comments fall within the rather broad boundaries of protected speech? Readers, you be the judge and weigh in below."
"But the Secret Service is reportedly investigating because some might interpret his remarks as threatening to the president. While not accusing Nugent of directly threatening Barack Obama, the head of the Democratic National Committee has complained that the aging rock star was over the line, and preposterously tried to paint Nugent as a Romney operative." ... |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|