|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
mickey
(6/3/2015)
|
| Hey, if Whoraldo is that upset, Vince has done a Goodness Thing. |
| Comment by:
jughead
(6/4/2015)
|
| cant post what i think of geraldo. change channels every time he comes on. |
| Comment by:
-none-
(6/4/2015)
|
I was actually watching that segment and changed the channel when I saw jerry rivers...to be fair, I did listen long enough to be disgusted, which actually took a few minutes because he wasn't saying anything, but when he actually did it was hostile bs-vitriol. So I missed all of the **** and had to come back to breitbart for an update. When The Five allow a host in the actual employ of Fox News to purport lies, even when he is rebuffed, it damages the brand of the the show segment as well as the hosting channel.
"Geraldo later denied that guns are used by law-abiding citizens to stop crimes. He asked fellow host Eric Bolling, “When was the last time you heard of a civilian stopping a crime with a gun?” And when Bolling said, “It happens |
| Comment by:
-none-
(6/4/2015)
|
thousands of times per day,” Geraldo responded by saying, “That’s a legend. You’re watching too much True Detective.”
The number Bolling was looking for was 2,082 defensive gun uses (DGUs) per day. That number comes from Florida State University criminologist Gary Kleck’s scholarly work showing a minimum of 760,000 DGUs a year." |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
