|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
CT: New Haven Police are Working With ATF to Track Ghost Guns
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertypakrpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The New Haven Police Department has seized nine so-called ghost guns this year, which is almost three times the number seized by this time a year ago. Although police have these guns in their possession, it’s difficult to find who they belong to because of their nature. Police Sergeant John Finch said ghost guns consist of all different parts that people then put together, which makes them hard to track. |
| Comment by:
jimobxpelham
(10/27/2021)
|
not against law to build your own firearms, these so called ghost guns were in possession of criminals, they cant have any firearms by law. 400 million firearms in the us, extremely small number of so called ghost firearms are in position of gun owners, what is that a millionth of a fraction of one percent.
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
