|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
CA: State auditor finds discrepancies in Sacramento County's CCW permit processes
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
To carry a concealed weapon in California, you must have a conceal and carry weapons (CCW) permit.
In Sacramento County, the sheriff's department determines if someone qualifies for a license by looking at four requirements: good moral character, good cause for the license, is a resident of the county and has completed firearms training.
A newly released state audit found inconsistencies with the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department permitting process for CCW.
The state auditor reviewed three counties: Sacramento, Los Angeles and San Diego. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(12/16/2017)
|
Correction: State Audit Finds Major Discrepancies in Los Angeles County.
"The audit said none of the three counties were consistent in using their own internal standards to evaluate applications.
In Sacramento, the auditor also found that the sheriff's department doesn't collect sufficient documentation to prove applicants meet all CCW permit requirements.
All three departments charge application processing fees for CCW licensing, but the fees do not appear to cover the costs of the programs.
The report also states it found the starkest failure to follow policy in Los Angeles County." |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
