|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MI: Glen Lake first school in state to install gunshot detectors in new security system
Submitted by:
Corey Salo
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
It's back to school for students across northern Michigan.
And one school district is taking an extra step to keep your child safe.
Glen Lake Community Schools installed new security systems over the summer, which will help protect students in the event of an active shooter.
“One thing we’ve heard loud and clear is whatever it takes to keep kids safe,” said Superintendent Sander Scott.
Starting this year, their school is now equipped with a new system, one their team came up with themselves by combining systems from multiple companies.
“We didn’t want to have a single point of failure for a system,” said Director of Administration and Instructional Technology Marcus Mead.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/7/2018)
|
| (Cue "Simpsons" East Indian convenience store clerk) "My cameras see much more than just who is about to shoot me." |
| Comment by:
jac
(9/7/2018)
|
Complete waste of money.
If they really want to keep their students safe they would allow responsible teachers/administrators to have guns. |
| Comment by:
jac
(9/7/2018)
|
Complete waste of money.
If they really want to keep their students safe they would allow responsible teachers/administrators to have guns. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
