|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
dasing
(1/16/2017)
|
| If those people are so dangerous, why are still out of jail? |
| Comment by:
jac
(1/16/2017)
|
Another empty headed liberal that believes people should loose their rights because some bureaucrat puts their name on a list without any judicial oversight.
The only way I would support such a restriction would be if the law awarded $1 million dollars in damages to be paid directly by said bureaucrat if the individual was wrongly placed on the list.
There has to be consequences when people are wrongly identified and deprived of constitutional rights. |
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(1/16/2017)
|
| Here's a recipe for govt to deny rights as they are won't to do. Lots of ideas that sound good on the surface and not enough due process or even basic enforce of present laws. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
