|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NH: Suggesting 2nd Amendment supports armed rebellion is nonsense
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Since a semi-automatic is semi, not fully automatic they included them in the list of weapons permitted for the public. History has shown that to have been a grave error. Because of the rapid fire capability of semi-automatics they are the weapon of choice for mass murderers, haters, and suicidal crazies determined to take down innocents in the process. The AR-15 with 30 round clips greatly magnifies the harm they can inflict before being taken down themselves. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(12/29/2018)
|
The author is suggesting that the purpose of the armed militia was to put down uprisings like Shay's revolt, not insurrection.
Bizarrely, he doesn't understand that BOTH are correct and NOT mutually exclusive. Defending against unjustified uprisings would be a legitimate purpose .... but so would defending against a tyrannical government.
Oh .... as usual, the author claims there is no right to have full auto, and even semiauto AR-15s are a mistake..... so there's ONE MORE SMART A $$ out there who does not understand what "infringe" means.
*SIGH!* |
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(12/30/2018)
|
| In the minds of the deciders, disarmament of a free people is necessary to implement that new tyrannical regime that they so desperately seek. They never quit... |
| Comment by:
jac
(12/30/2018)
|
| Another flaming liberal that doesn't understand history. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
