|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NY: Legislature Eyes Expansion of Gun Control
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Monday his support for stringent gun control measures is so strong that he wants to see it mentioned in the first paragraph of the eulogy that will be given when he dies. Cuomo's provocative statement in a public radio interview, addressing a topic that divides the state along regional lines, came on the eve of what is expected to be the passage of several pieces of legislation designed to expand on the controversial gun restrictions he signed following the massacre of school children and teachers at a Connecticut school in 2012.
|
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(1/29/2019)
|
Kind of sounds like someone has decided to totally disregard the Constitution, and implement a new Gang that will have unlimited powers to destroy all rights in their agenda to force complete submission. Has kind of a criminal ring to it, doesn't it?
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
