|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Gun Rights Supporters to Rally in Twin Thursday
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
ID: Gun rights supporters plan to hold a rally at Red’s Trading Post on Thursday.
The Idaho Second Amendment Alliance is organizing the “Rally for Constitutional Carry,” and the group’s president, Greg Pruett, is expected to speak, as well as Lance Earl, a 2014 legislative candidate and conservative blogger from the Pocatello area, according to the event’s Facebook page. The group is also holding rallies in Pocatello, Rexburg, Lewiston and Coeur d’Alene.
|
| Comment by:
mickey
(9/21/2015)
|
WTF ever happened in Red's vs ATF?
The only court order I can find is a denial of summary judgment and decision of the court to schedule a trial (January 2008).
In 2009, FFL Guard put out a press release proclaiming the matter settled, taking full credit for making the settlement happen, and telling the world how wonderful FFL Guard is.
http://www.ammoland.com/2009/03/fflguard-assists-with-conclusion-of-litigation-between-reds-trading-post-and-atf
Are we to assume that the settlement was for ATF to quit trying to put Red's out of business, and Red's to quit spreading nasty truths about the ATF, with a Non-Disclosure Agreement prohibiting the parties from ever talking about it? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
