|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NJ: Union Shooting Range Owner Recognizes Challenges
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
It’s the only one of its kind in a 15-mile radius, and RTSP co-owner and chief executive officer Rick Friedman recognizes the challenges that come with operating his shooting range in a state with some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. “I would love to have the freedoms that everyone else enjoys, but I’ll always be a Jersey boy” Friedman, who co-owns the RTSP gun range, told LocalSource on Dec. 13. “I want to change my home and I want my home to recognize the rights of other states instead of running away. If I leave, they win.” |
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(12/24/2018)
|
| Apparently the citizenry there, needs to be told that they have "Rights". So, where did these "Elected Officials" get the idea that by showing total disregard for the Constitution will give them "No Limits" on governmental powers? Sounds as if a trail by jury for breaking the Oath of Office, could be the only thing that is going keep these under miners of our Constitutional form of government in line with the "Law of the Land". TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 |
| Comment by:
jac
(12/24/2018)
|
| If you leave you win and the state that you move to wins. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
