|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
AZ: Did he have to shoot? [Editorializing away the right to defend yourself]
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://home.comcast.net/~bruce.krafft/
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"The fatal shooting of an unarmed man last month in the woods north of Payson has aroused heated reactions."
"Some say the shooter, 57-year-old Harold Fish of Glendale, had no excuse for firing three bullets from his 10mm semiautomatic pistol into the chest of 43-year-old Grant Kuenzli."
"Others, including Fish's attorney, Mel McDonald, say he faced a frightening threat from Kuenzli and his three dogs. They call the shooting a clear case of self-defense."
"The truth, we suspect, rests somewhere between those polar views, and the decision by Coconino County Attorney Terry Hance to charge Fish with second-degree murder seems proper."
"Fair-minded people, however, may add up the evidence differently. Coconino sheriff's Detective Scott Feagan, for one, came to a sharply different conclusion. He said his department's investigation showed Fish acted in self-defense and called the death justifiable homicide." ...
-------
It's nice to know that this editor admits that those agreeing with the experienced investigators are "fair-minded". |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
