|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Bogus "Study": You're More Likely to Be Shot By Cop in Pro-Gun States
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork,com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Researchers from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Northeastern University came together to study the correlation between states' gun ownership and officer-involved shootings. The researchers published their findings in the Journal for Urban Health. Their grandiose takeaway: if you live in a state with "looser" gun laws – AKA you're allowed to utilize your Second Amendment rights – then you're more likely to be shot by police officers.
|
| Comment by:
jac
(10/16/2018)
|
You're more likely to be shot by a cop if you break the law.
Law abiding people rarely get shot by a cop. It happens, like in Dallas where a cop shot a man in his apartment, but it is an aberration that is not statistically meaningful.
Cops shooting criminals doesn't bother me in the least. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(10/16/2018)
|
| jac, since cops mistakenly shoot and kill people about twice as often as cops get killed on duty, would you say that cop deaths are statistically insignificant too? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
