Keep and Bear Arms
Home Members Login/Join About Us News/Editorials Archives Take Action Your Voice Web Services Free Email
You are 1 of 252 active visitors Saturday, March 25, 2023
Main Email List:

State Email Lists:
Click Here
» Join/Renew Online
» Join/Renew by Mail
» Make a Donation
» Magazine Subscriptions
» KABA Memorial Fund
» Advertise Here
» Use KABA Free Email

» JOIN/Renew NOW! «



Keep and Bear Arms - Vote In Our Polls
Do you oppose Biden's anti-gun executive orders?

Current results
Earlier poll results
4608 people voted



» U.S. Gun Laws
» AmeriPAC
» NoInternetTax
» Gun Show On The Net
» 2nd Amendment Show
» SEMPER FIrearms
» Colt Collectors Assoc.
» Personal Defense Solutions



Keep and Bear Arms


Archived Information

Top | Last 30 Days | Search | Add to Archives | Newsletter | Featured Item

Lying from the Rooftops
How VPC distorts the record to link gun makers to bin Laden.

by Sean Oberle

October 9, 2001

According to Violence Policy Center (VPC),

“The U.S. gun industry sold at least twenty-five 50 [sic] caliber sniper rifles to Al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden's terror network.”

This is a deliberate attempt to make people believe something that is not true. Where I come from, that’s considered a lie.

Read that VPC quote again. Do you envision some gun industry executive shipping a load of .50s to bin Laden? Do you assume that it took place within the last year or two? If so, you’ve been misled by Tom Diaz, VPC senior policy analyst. He wrote the propaganda faux-study titled “Voting From the Rooftops” that makes this allegation.

The truth: In 1989 or before, a man named Essam al Ridi helped to ship 25 Barrett .50 caliber rifles to Afghanistan for use against the Soviets. It’s not really clear what year al Ridi actually transferred the weapons. In his testimony in United States of America v. Usama bin Laden (, al Ridi explains that the Afghan rebels to whom he provided the weapons were having trouble sighting the weapons, so in 1989 he went to help them. In any event, the sale was at least 12 years ago.

Al Ridi's testimony is the source of VPC’s allegation. Diaz is fully aware that this was a case of arming those who at the time not only were fighting the main enemy of the United States but were trying to expel a ruthless invader from their homeland. Diaz, however, also knows that many of these Afghan rebels later turned into anti-American terrorists under bin Laden’s leadership, and he thinks he can smear “the gun industry” with a bit of equivocation.

It is true enough that these 25 American-made rifles very well may be in the hands of terrorists now, and that is bad -– although, for all we know, the rifles are in the hands of the Northern Alliance or are long since destroyed or damaged beyond use.

However, to imply that there is some sort of collusion between gun makers and terrorists borders on slanderous. In my opinion, it would be slanderous had Diaz named someone rather than the nebulous “gun industry” as having sold the weapons to terrorists, but I’ll leave it up to Barrett’s lawyers to decide if that company has a case based on VPC mentioning its name in the same paragraph that it made the allegation at the top of this article.

If you have any doubt about Diaz’s goal of making this seem like “the gun industry” is in collusion with terrorists, consider the following statement by him in the VPC press release announcing the propaganda:

"We can be shocked, but not surprised that the gun industry would sell these dangerous military weapons to Al Qaeda.” (See

Indeed, Tom, I stopped being shocked or surprised at what spews out of your organization. I’m just nauseous at how dirty I feel after reading your propaganda.

To read about other lies and distortions from the "Violence Policy Center," go here:

Sean Oberle's archives can be accessed here:

Printer Version

That the said Constitution shall never be construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of The United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms... — Samuel Adams, Debates and Proceedings in the Convention of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, at 86-87 (Pierce & Hale, eds., Boston, 1850).

COPYRIGHT POLICY: The posting of copyrighted articles and other content, in whole or in part, is not allowed here. We have made an effort to educate our users about this policy and we are extremely serious about this. Users who are caught violating this rule will be warned and/or banned.
If you are the owner of content that you believe has been posted on this site without your permission, please contact our webmaster by following this link. Please include with your message: (1) the particulars of the infringement, including a description of the content, (2) a link to that content here and (3) information concerning where the content in question was originally posted/published. We will address your complaint as quickly as possible. Thank you.

NOTICE:  The information contained in this site is not to be considered as legal advice. In no way are Keep And Bear Arms .com or any of its agents responsible for the actions of our members or site visitors. Also, because this web site is a Free Speech Zone, opinions, ideas, beliefs, suggestions, practices and concepts throughout this site may or may not represent those of Keep And Bear Arms .com. All rights reserved. Articles that are original to this site may be redistributed provided they are left intact and a link to is given. Click here for Contact Information for representatives of is the leading provider of Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and digital certificate solutions used by enterprises, Web sites, and consumers to conduct secure communications and transactions over the Internet and private networks., Inc. © 1999-2023, All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy