Keep and Bear Arms
Home Members Login/Join About Us News/Editorials Archives Take Action Your Voice Web Services Free Email
You are 1 of 225 active visitors Friday, June 21, 2024
Main Email List:

State Email Lists:
Click Here
Join/Renew Online
Join/Renew by Mail
Make a Donation
Magazine Subscriptions
KABA Memorial Fund
Advertise Here
Use KABA Free Email




Keep and Bear Arms - Vote In Our Polls
Do you oppose Biden's anti-gun executive orders?

Current results
Earlier poll results
4743 people voted



» U.S. Gun Laws
» AmeriPAC
» NoInternetTax
» Gun Show On The Net
» 2nd Amendment Show
» SEMPER FIrearms
» Colt Collectors Assoc.
» Personal Defense Solutions



Keep and Bear Arms


Archived Information

Top | Last 30 Days | Search | Add to Archives | Newsletter | Featured Item

Mad Dad Gets Mad!

From: Richard Dimery <>
Organization: SQA
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 08:54:07 -0600
Subject: Armed Response - Necessary

It’s almost two months after the terrorist attacks, and has anyone seen reinforced cockpit doors? Air marshals? Pilots with stronger bladders? Everyday the Airlines ask the Customers to fly where all the peaceable citizens are guaranteed to be unarmed, where the bad guys’ only job is to gain the upper hand through force. And, oh yes, have you ever heard of BARE HANDS as a deadly weapon? The Airlines have blown through the BAILOUT MONEY, but has consumer confidence been assuaged?

Bush is wrong on this one. The Airlines are wrong. The gun control advocates are wrong. The terrorists’ ultimate target must be assumed to be the flight deck. I just read the BBC public feedback on arming pilots. The number one fear, it seems, is based on the fantasy that a bullet could cause a destructive decompression. This is followed by the two most frequently suggested “fixes”: ground security improvements, and sealed cockpits. Is it fair to passengers, pilot, or crew, that their only alternative is to “bet the farm" that NO ONE in the ground security chain ever be inattentive, negligible, incompetent, or worse? Must pilots give up the notion of relieving themselves? If faced with a forceful takeover, is it fair, or rational, that pilots must defend their plane barehanded or with a clumsy axe?

All the security measures being proposed, in lieu of arming pilots, will take finite time to be implemented. Political Correctness does not, or should not be allowed to, trump the commonsense reality that the Pilot is the LAST LINE OF DEFENSE of his cockpit, his command, and many lives. This is a deadly serious responsibility, and worthy of a lethal force response option.


To Get Your Letters Printed Here
Click here and read submission guidelines.

Printer Version

Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836

COPYRIGHT POLICY: The posting of copyrighted articles and other content, in whole or in part, is not allowed here. We have made an effort to educate our users about this policy and we are extremely serious about this. Users who are caught violating this rule will be warned and/or banned.
If you are the owner of content that you believe has been posted on this site without your permission, please contact our webmaster by following this link. Please include with your message: (1) the particulars of the infringement, including a description of the content, (2) a link to that content here and (3) information concerning where the content in question was originally posted/published. We will address your complaint as quickly as possible. Thank you.

NOTICE:  The information contained in this site is not to be considered as legal advice. In no way are Keep And Bear Arms .com or any of its agents responsible for the actions of our members or site visitors. Also, because this web site is a Free Speech Zone, opinions, ideas, beliefs, suggestions, practices and concepts throughout this site may or may not represent those of Keep And Bear Arms .com. All rights reserved. Articles that are original to this site may be redistributed provided they are left intact and a link to is given. Click here for Contact Information for representatives of is the leading provider of Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and digital certificate solutions used by enterprises, Web sites, and consumers to conduct secure communications and transactions over the Internet and private networks., Inc. © 1999-2024, All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy